Commonwealth v. International Harvester Co.

180 S.W. 522, 167 Ky. 318, 1915 Ky. LEXIS 846
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided December 14, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Miller

Eeversing in each case.

These two appeals present the same question that was decided in Commonwealth v. American Tobacco Company, 167 Ky., 157, where it was held that under the act of 1890, condemning pools, trusts, and conspiracies .(Kentucky Statutes, sections 3915-3921), a corporation or person that enters into a pool, trust, combination, or agreement, for the purpose of regulating, controlling, and fixing the price of property, is subject to the penalty denounced by that statute. See Gay v. Brent, 166 Ky., 833,

Since the circuit court, however,, sustained a demurrer to the petition based upon the statute, supra, the judgment will have to be reversed in each appeal.

The question of limitation discussed in the brief is not decided.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. International Harvester Co., 180 S.W. 522, 167 Ky. 318, 1915 Ky. LEXIS 846 (Ky. Ct. App. 1915).

180 S.W. 522 (Commonwealth v. International Harvester Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Hatfield Coal Co.
217 S.W. 125 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)