Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of Phillipsburg

10 Mass. 78
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 15, 1813·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Curia.

We cannot change the name of the defendants in the indictment; nor is there any occasion for it. We have no difficulty in proceeding upon the indictment as it stands; nor in inflicting a fine and awarding execution against the defendants by the name of the inhabitants of Phillipsburg. If a feme sole intermarries pending an action against her, the action still proceeds against her by her former name; and she may be taken on execution, notwithstanding her coverture.

So neither the defendants nor the attorney-general took any thing by their respective motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of Phillipsburg, 10 Mass. 78 (Mass. 1813).

10 Mass. 78 (Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of Phillipsburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Snow
269 Mass. 598 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Stone v. Jenkins
57 N.E. 1002 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. Weller
30 Fla. 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)
Sumner v. Pinney
31 Vt. 717 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1859)
Holten v. Cook
12 Mass. 574 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1815)