Commonwealth v. Imbruglia

343 N.E.2d 160, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 787, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 564
CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 343 N.E.2d 160 (Commonwealth v. Imbruglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Imbruglia, 343 N.E.2d 160, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 787, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 564 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

The remark made by the prosecutor in the presence of the jury at the close of the evidence was unfortunate at best. The judge promptly and forcefully gave clear and correct curative instructions. Compare Commonwealth v. D’Ambra, 357 Mass. 260, 262 (1970). The evidence of Imbruglia’s guilt was particularly strong, and we are not persuaded that the remark, when considered in the light of the instructions, contributed to the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. D'Ambra
258 N.E.2d 74 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 N.E.2d 160, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 787, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-imbruglia-massappct-1976.