Commonwealth v. Hyneman

101 Mass. 30
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The defendant is found guilty of selling intoxicating liquors on the Lord’s day, contrary to the provisions of St. 1868, c. 141. He has a license; but, by § 10, the license does not authorize him to sell on that day. But he offered to prove that he was a Jew, conscientiously believing that the seventh day is the Sabbath. His conscientious belief might protect him from a prosecution for violating the provisions of the Gen. Sts. c. 84, by acts of secular labor on the Lord’s day (see § 9), provided he violated no other law. But it is no excuse for his violation of the law respecting the sale of intoxicating liquors. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Hyneman, 101 Mass. 30 (Mass. 1869).

101 Mass. 30 (Commonwealth v. Hyneman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Walker v. Judge of Section "A," Criminal District Court
39 La. Ann. 132 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1887)