Commonwealth v. Hyman, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hyman, J.

203 A.3d 982

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 11, 2019·No. 425 EAL 2018·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err and rely upon erroneous legal reasoning in upholding the trial court's order denying Javon Hyman's petition to dismiss pursuant to Rule 600?

The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Mills, 640 Pa. 118 , 162 A.3d 323 (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err and rely upon erroneous legal reasoning in upholding the trial court's order denying Javon Hyman's petition to dismiss pursuant to Rule 600?

The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Mills, 640 Pa. 118 , 162 A.3d 323 (2017).

Commonwealth v. Hyman, J., 203 A.3d 982 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

203 A.3d 982 (Commonwealth v. Hyman, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related