Commonwealth v. Hyman, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hyman, J.

203 A.3d 982

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 11, 2019

Docket425 EAL 2018

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 203 A.3d 982 (Commonwealth v. Hyman, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hyman, J., 203 A.3d 982 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err and rely upon erroneous legal reasoning in upholding the trial court's order denying Javon Hyman's petition to dismiss pursuant to Rule 600?

The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Mills, 640 Pa. 118 , 162 A.3d 323 (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err and rely upon erroneous legal reasoning in upholding the trial court's order denying Javon Hyman's petition to dismiss pursuant to Rule 600?

The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Mills, 640 Pa. 118 , 162 A.3d 323 (2017).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.3d 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hyman-j-pa-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack