Commonwealth v. Hunt

243 Mass. 286
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 7, 1922·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This is a complaint charging the defendant ■with being the father of a child of a woman who had never married. There was evidence to support the charge. There was no error in excluding the question to the mother whether she had given birth to other children. That had nothing to do with the offence described in the complaint. Easdale v. Reynolds, 143 Mass. 126. Paull v. Padelford, 16 Gray, 263. Inquiry whether a witness called by the Commonwealth had made investigation as to the complainant’s reputation for veracity was excluded rightly.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Hunt, 243 Mass. 286 (Mass. 1922).

243 Mass. 286 (Commonwealth v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. United Food Corp.
374 N.E.2d 1231 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Baxter
166 N.E. 742 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)