Commonwealth v. Hunt

243 Mass. 286
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 7, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 243 Mass. 286 (Commonwealth v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Hunt, 243 Mass. 286 (Mass. 1922).

Opinion

By the Court.

This is a complaint charging the defendant ■with being the father of a child of a woman who had never married. There was evidence to support the charge. There was no error in excluding the question to the mother whether she had given birth to other children. That had nothing to do with the offence described in the complaint. Easdale v. Reynolds, 143 Mass. 126. Paull v. Padelford, 16 Gray, 263. Inquiry whether a witness called by the Commonwealth had made investigation as to the complainant’s reputation for veracity was excluded rightly.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. United Food Corp.
374 N.E.2d 1231 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Baxter
166 N.E. 742 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 Mass. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hunt-mass-1922.