Commonwealth v. Hunsberger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hunsberger

21 A.3d 679, 610 Pa. 453, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1405

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 16, 2011·No. 7 MAL 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of June 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED to the following issue, as stated by Petitioner:

a. Whether a panel of the Superior Court erred by holding that a criminal defendant in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does not have the right to be present for any questioning of prospective jurors on substantive issues when such questioning is done outside the hearing of the defendant in violation of a defendant’s constitutional and procedural rights?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of June 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED to the following issue, as stated by Petitioner:

a. Whether a panel of the Superior Court erred by holding that a criminal defendant in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does not have the right to be present for any questioning of prospective jurors on substantive issues when such questioning is done outside the hearing of the defendant in violation of a defendant’s constitutional and procedural rights?

Commonwealth v. Hunsberger, 21 A.3d 679, 610 Pa. 453, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1405 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

21 A.3d 679 (Commonwealth v. Hunsberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related