Commonwealth v. Hull

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hull

435 A.2d 1204, 495 Pa. 644, 1981 Pa. LEXIS 971

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 24, 1981

DocketNo. 59

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 435 A.2d 1204 (Commonwealth v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hull, 435 A.2d 1204, 495 Pa. 644, 1981 Pa. LEXIS 971 (Pa. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Larry Gene Hull, was convicted of murder of the first degree by the trial court following his guilty plea to murder generally. In this direct appeal he raises only one issue: whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of murder of the first degree in view of his evidence that he was intoxicated and acting under the influence of a mental illness at the time of the shooting. We have reviewed the record and find appellant’s contentions without merit.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Larry Gene Hull, was convicted of murder of the first degree by the trial court following his guilty plea to murder generally. In this direct appeal he raises only one issue: whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of murder of the first degree in view of his evidence that he was intoxicated and acting under the influence of a mental illness at the time of the shooting. We have reviewed the record and find appellant’s contentions without merit.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 A.2d 1204, 495 Pa. 644, 1981 Pa. LEXIS 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hull-pa-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack