Commonwealth v. Hughes
This text of 5 Va. 655 (Commonwealth v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Not deciding whether the cause stated be one, on account of which the Superior Court could regularly adjourn a case here for decision, it is the opinion of this Court, that the declaration of the juror was not the expression of an opinion relative to the guilt or innocence of the prisoner, but from the words used by him, was a reply to some loose and general statement, of the accuracy of which he had probably not reflected. A new trial ought not to have been granted to the prisoner on such grounck
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Va. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hughes-vagensess-1826.