Commonwealth v. Hude
This text of 406 A.2d 554 (Commonwealth v. Hude) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, on this appeal, argues that his trial and conviction of perjury1 are barred by double jeopardy, collateral estoppel and Section 110 of the Crimes Code2 where he had previously been acquitted in two prior trials on various drug charges. We find that issue to be controlled by Commonwealth v. Klinger, 264 Pa.Super. 21, 398 A.2d 1036 (1979).
It is further contended that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We have reviewed the record and find this contention to be without merit.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
406 A.2d 554, 267 Pa. Super. 133, 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hude-pasuperct-1979.