Commonwealth v. Howie

238 N.E.2d 373, 354 Mass. 769, 1968 Mass. LEXIS 961
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 5, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by44 cases

This text of 238 N.E.2d 373 (Commonwealth v. Howie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Howie, 238 N.E.2d 373, 354 Mass. 769, 1968 Mass. LEXIS 961 (Mass. 1968).

Opinion

The defendant appeals from a finding of guilty of violating G. L. c. 90, § 7, for not wearing protective headgear while operating a motorcycle. Upon appeal from a finding in the District Court the case was heard by a judge sitting without jury in the Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex under St. 1964, c. 628. The defendant filed a written motion to dismiss which was denied, and he was again found guilty. The defendant excepts to the denial of his motion to dismiss. There was no error. General Laws c. 90, § 7, requires every person operating or riding a motorcycle to wear protective headgear conforming with certain minimum standards. It lies within the power of the Legislature to adopt reasonable measures for the promotion of safety upon public ways in the interests of motorcyclists and others who may use them. Commonwealth v. Boston & Maine Transp. Co. 282 Mass. 345, 348. The act of the Legislature bears a real and substantial relation to the public health and general welfare and is thus a valid exercise of the police power. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Pub. Health, 348 Mass. 414, 422. As contended by the Commonwealth, “Qf]he legislation is reasonable, applies to all equally, and is directly related to highway safety.” See Hall-Omar Baking Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & Indus. 344 Mass. 695, 700. A recent Michigan decision to the contrary is not persuasive. On this general subject we find ourselves in agreement with Colvin v. Lombardi, 241 Atl. 2d 625 (R. I.).

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kohrig
498 N.E.2d 1158 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1986)
Commonwealth v. Guest
425 N.E.2d 779 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)
Marcoux v. Attorney General
375 N.E.2d 688 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Cowan
344 N.E.2d 419 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1976)
Opinion of the Justices to the House of Representatives
333 N.E.2d 385 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
People v. Henninger
328 N.E.2d 580 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
City of Albuquerque v. Jones
535 P.2d 1337 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1975)
Cesin v. State
288 So. 2d 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
State v. Merski
307 A.2d 825 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1973)
Kingery v. Chapple
504 P.2d 831 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1972)
Simon v. Sargent
346 F. Supp. 277 (D. Massachusetts, 1972)
Pinnick v. Cleary
271 N.E.2d 592 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
State v. Acker
485 P.2d 1038 (Utah Supreme Court, 1971)
Bogue v. Faircloth
316 F. Supp. 486 (S.D. Florida, 1970)
Penney v. City of North Little Rock
455 S.W.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)
City of Wichita v. White
469 P.2d 287 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Coffman
453 S.W.2d 759 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1970)
State v. Edwards
177 N.W.2d 40 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1970)
Elliott v. City of Oklahoma City
1970 OK CR 56 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 N.E.2d 373, 354 Mass. 769, 1968 Mass. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-howie-mass-1968.