Commonwealth v. Hopkins, L., Jr.

133 A.3d 737, 635 Pa. 206, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 538
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 24, 2016
Docket899 MAL 2015 (Granted)
StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.3d 737 (Commonwealth v. Hopkins, L., Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Hopkins, L., Jr., 133 A.3d 737, 635 Pa. 206, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether, under Pennsylvania law, a search warrant should be invalidated and the resulting evidence suppressed where an affiant truthfully and accurately recites statements made by a self-incriminating co-defendant in an affidavit of probable cause, but the falsity of the co-defendant’s statements could not be discovered prior to the issuance of the search warrant?
Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.3d 737, 635 Pa. 206, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hopkins-l-jr-pa-2016.