Commonwealth v. Holmes, C., Pet

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 3, 2014
Docket100 MM 2014
StatusPublished

This text of Commonwealth v. Holmes, C., Pet (Commonwealth v. Holmes, C., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Holmes, C., Pet, (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 100 MM 2014 : Respondent : : : v. : : : CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, : : Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is directed to file the

already-prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 48 hours of this order.

Justice Stevens would indicate in the order that counsel was negligent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Commonwealth v. Holmes, C., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-holmes-c-pet-pa-2014.