Commonwealth v. Hollinger

42 A. 548, 190 Pa. 155, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 999
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 27, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 16·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

A careful examination of the record in this case discloses nothing that would warrant us in sustaining any of the assignments of error. The opinion of the learned president judge of the court below, on the motion for a new trial, unanswerably meets every question raised by this appeal. The main question, that is, the measure of evidence necessary to establish insanity as an excuse for crime, and the effect of such evidence when not sufficient to acquit, is also fully discussed in Commonwealth v. Wireback, ante, p. 138, appeal from oyer and terminer of Lancaster, argued January 30,1899, opinion handed down this day, so that nothing further need be said on the subject.

The judgment is affirmed, and it is directed that the record be remitted to the court below that the sentence may be carried into execution according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Hollinger, 42 A. 548, 190 Pa. 155, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 999 (Pa. 1899).

42 A. 548 (Commonwealth v. Hollinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gramenz
126 N.W.2d 285 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1964)
United States Ex Rel. Smith v. Baldi
192 F.2d 540 (Third Circuit, 1951)
Commonwealth v. Gibbs
76 A.2d 608 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Battalino v. People
199 P.2d 897 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1948)
Fisher v. United States
328 U.S. 463 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Stanton v. State
5 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
State v. Wickman
43 P.2d 933 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1935)
Commonwealth v. Sabo
83 Pa. Super. 166 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Sheets
46 A. 753 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)