Commonwealth v. Holder

777 A.2d 1055
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 12, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 777 A.2d 1055 (Commonwealth v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Holder, 777 A.2d 1055 (Pa. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited as follows:

Did the trial court err in denying Petitioner’s motion in limine on grounds of collateral estoppel? If collateral estoppel was properly applied, did Superior Court err in failing to review the evidentiary ruling on the merits? See Commonwealth [1056]*1056v. Lagana, 510 Pa. 477, 509 A.2d 863, 866-67 (1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Lagana
509 A.2d 863 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 A.2d 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-holder-pa-2001.