Commonwealth v. Holcomb

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Holcomb

396 A.2d 29, 261 Pa. Super. 532

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 17, 1978

DocketAppeal, 527

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 396 A.2d 29 (Commonwealth v. Holcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Holcomb, 396 A.2d 29, 261 Pa. Super. 532 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s brief being so defective as to be useless to the Court, the appeal is quashed in accordance with Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2101. See also, Rule 2118, Pa.R.A.P., and Commonwealth v. Wyant, 254 Pa.Super. 464, 386 A.2d 43 (1978). The prothonotary is directed to send a copy of this order directly to appellant.

JACOBS, P. J., and SPAETH, J., would affirm. WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s brief being so defective as to be useless to the Court, the appeal is quashed in accordance with Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2101. See also, Rule 2118, Pa.R.A.P., and Commonwealth v. Wyant, 254 Pa.Super. 464, 386 A.2d 43 (1978). The prothonotary is directed to send a copy of this order directly to appellant.

JACOBS, P. J., and SPAETH, J., would affirm. WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

396 A.2d 29, 261 Pa. Super. 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-holcomb-pasuperct-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack