Commonwealth v. Hoke

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hoke

946 A.2d 645

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Hoke. Read the opinion of the Court — 599 Pa. 587 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 2008·No. 626 MAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 35 P.S. § 780-113(k) apply to a conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance.

Justice Todd did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 35 P.S. § 780-113(k) apply to a conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance.

Justice Todd did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. Hoke, 946 A.2d 645 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

946 A.2d 645 (Commonwealth v. Hoke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related