Commonwealth v. Hine
62 A. 369, 213 Pa. 97, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 379
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 30, 1905·No. Appeal, No. 216·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
The single assignment of error is that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion.
[100]*100The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence may be executed in accordance with law.
October 80, 1905 :
Rule for new trial under Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Hine, 62 A. 369, 213 Pa. 97, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 379 (Pa. 1905).
62 A. 369 (Commonwealth v. Hine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fischer v. Hunsberger
35 A.2d 91 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Stewart v. Leiper
16 A.2d 660 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Peters v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America
193 A. 460 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Catania's Estate
20 Pa. D. & C. 656 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1934)
Hornick v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.
165 A. 36 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Commonwealth. v. Garramone
161 A. 733 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Limper v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
146 A. 574 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Commonwealth v. Smith
89 Pa. Super. 190 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Commonwealth v. Mellon
81 Pa. Super. 20 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Commonwealth v. Carter
116 A. 409 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
McCue v. State
170 S.W. 280 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)