Commonwealth v. Hillside Cemetery Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hillside Cemetery Co.

32 A. 404, 170 Pa. 227, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1388

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 18, 1895·No. Appeal No. 20·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Notwithstanding the able and ingenious argument of learned counsel for appellant, we are not convinced that there is any error in that part of the learned trial judge’s ehai'ge recited in the assignment of error. On the contrary, we are all satisfied that his construction of the act, under which the tax in question was imposed, is strictly correct. There is nothing in the question involved that requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Notwithstanding the able and ingenious argument of learned counsel for appellant, we are not convinced that there is any error in that part of the learned trial judge’s ehai'ge recited in the assignment of error. On the contrary, we are all satisfied that his construction of the act, under which the tax in question was imposed, is strictly correct. There is nothing in the question involved that requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Hillside Cemetery Co., 32 A. 404, 170 Pa. 227, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1388 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

32 A. 404 (Commonwealth v. Hillside Cemetery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related