Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Virginia

Commonwealth v. Hill

6 Va. 636

DecidedJune 15, 1836

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 636 (Commonwealth v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hill, 6 Va. 636 (Va. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam

Since the passing of the recent statute to amend and explain the marriage act (act of 1835-6, ch. 64. Sess. Acts, p. 43.), it is understood but little interest is felt as to the decision of the questions adjourned to this court. It is necessary, however, that a decision should be made, that the case may proceed in the court below. The following judgment is to be entered—‘£ The court is of opinion and doth decide, that the indictment is sufficient, and neither count thereof defective: this is deemed a sufficient answer to all the questions adjourned : which is ordered to be certified &c.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam

Since the passing of the recent statute to amend and explain the marriage act (act of 1835-6, ch. 64. Sess. Acts, p. 43.), it is understood but little interest is felt as to the decision of the questions adjourned to this court. It is necessary, however, that a decision should be made, that the case may proceed in the court below. The following judgment is to be entered—‘£ The court is of opinion and doth decide, that the indictment is sufficient, and neither count thereof defective: this is deemed a sufficient answer to all the questions adjourned : which is ordered to be certified &c.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hill-va-1836.