Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hill

864 A.2d 1201

DecidedDecember 29, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 864 A.2d 1201 (Commonwealth v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hill, 864 A.2d 1201 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002), petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim pertaining to trial counsel’s failure to pursue a jury charge cautioning the jury that he was denied the opportunity for an objective identification at a pretrial line-up under Commonwealth v. Sexton, 485 Pa. 17, 400 A.2d 1289 (1979), is dismissed without prejudice until collateral review. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002), petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim pertaining to trial counsel’s failure to pursue a jury charge cautioning the jury that he was denied the opportunity for an objective identification at a pretrial line-up under Commonwealth v. Sexton, 485 Pa. 17, 400 A.2d 1289 (1979), is dismissed without prejudice until collateral review. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

864 A.2d 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hill-pa-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack