Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hill

582 A.2d 857, 525 Pa. 505, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 231

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 523 Pa. 270 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 29, 1990·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 1990, the Commonwealth’s Application for Reargument is denied. The pleadings filed by Appellant Jeffrey D. Hill, styled “Defendant’s Affidavit of Prosecutorial Misconduct, Professional Misconduct & Violation of Oath of Office to Quash Reargument & Initiate Disciplinary Action”, “Writ of Habeas Corpus for the Reargument of 1988 Pa. Supreme Court — MD # 28 — Appeal Docket”, and “Motion for Special Relief”, are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 1990, the Commonwealth’s Application for Reargument is denied. The pleadings filed by Appellant Jeffrey D. Hill, styled “Defendant’s Affidavit of Prosecutorial Misconduct, Professional Misconduct & Violation of Oath of Office to Quash Reargument & Initiate Disciplinary Action”, “Writ of Habeas Corpus for the Reargument of 1988 Pa. Supreme Court — MD # 28 — Appeal Docket”, and “Motion for Special Relief”, are denied.

Commonwealth v. Hill, 582 A.2d 857, 525 Pa. 505, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 231 (Pa. 1990).

Pincite

582 A.2d 857 (Commonwealth v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.