Commonwealth v. Hill, M.
This text of Commonwealth v. Hill, M. (Commonwealth v. Hill, M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 482 EAL 2016 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Published Opinion and Order of v. : the Superior Court at No. 60 EDA 2016, : at 149 A.3d 362 (Pa. Super. 2016) : entered on October 20, 2016, affirming MARVIN HILL, : the PCRA Order of the Philadelphia : County Court of Common Pleas at No. Petitioner : CP-51-CR-0005356-2011 entered on : December 22, 2015
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2017, we GRANT the petition for allowance of
appeal and REVERSE the order of the Superior Court. The matter is hereby remanded
to the Superior Court to reinstate Petitioner’s appeal rights nunc pro tunc consistent with
Commonwealth v. Rosado, __ A.3d __, 2016 WL 7008042 (Pa. 2016).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Hill, M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hill-m-pa-2017.