Commonwealth v. Highland Crowe
This text of 1 Va. 125 (Commonwealth v. Highland Crowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN an indictment against the defendant for an assault. in the County Court of Loudon, a judgment was ren dered against him for 50/. from which judgment an ap[126]*126peal was taken to the district court of Dumfries. That court adjourned the case to the general court, and propounded the following questions: “ 1st. Whether upon “ prosecutions by indictment at the suit of the common- “ wealth, a defendant, against whom a pecuniary fine to “ the amount of one hundred dollars or more is assessed, u have the right of appeal or not: 2d, Whether, if an ap- “ peal be allowable as of right in such a case, such appeal 5t operates as a supersedeas to the judgment of the infe- “ rior court, from the time of granting the same.”
The general court, November 13th, 1800, consisting of Judges Prentis, Tucker, Tyler, Nelson, White and Carrington, declared their opinion to be, “ that the right “ of appeal does not extend to criminal cases, or prose-u cutions by indictments in behalf of the commonwealth.”
***See the following case decided at the same court by the same judges.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Va. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-highland-crowe-vagensess-1815.