Commonwealth v. Hicks

492 A.2d 61, 342 Pa. Super. 57, 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7247
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 26, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This Opinion will supplement our earlier Opinion Per Curiam filed June 1, 1984. 328 Pa.Super. 233, 476 A.2d 978.

We have now thoroughly reviewed the trial record, briefs submitted by counsel, applicable law and the Opinion of the Honorable Samuel Strauss filed December 14, 1984.

We agree with Judge Strauss that there is no merit whatsoever to any of the issues raised in this appeal.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Hicks, 492 A.2d 61, 342 Pa. Super. 57, 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7247 (Pa. Ct. App. 1985).

492 A.2d 61 (Commonwealth v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Advantage Funding Corp. v. Mid-TN Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000