Commonwealth v. Hicks, M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hicks, M.

172 A.3d 583

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 2, 2017·No. 286 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court’s bright line rule holding that possession of a concealed firearm in public is sufficient to create reasonable suspicion is a matter of such substantial public importance as to require prompt and definitive resolution by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court’s bright line rule holding that possession of a concealed firearm in public is sufficient to create reasonable suspicion is a matter of such substantial public importance as to require prompt and definitive resolution by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court?

Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., 172 A.3d 583 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

172 A.3d 583 (Commonwealth v. Hicks, M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related