Commonwealth v. Hickox

249 A.2d 777, 433 Pa. 144, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 538
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 31, 1969·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

At trial, petitioner was represented by appointed counsel. Subsequent to trial, new counsel was appointed to represent petitioner in his appeal to the Superior Court. Such an appeal was filed and resulted in an affirmance of the judgment of sentence. Thereafter, counsel for the petitioner informed petitioner that he would proceed no further with the matter.

Rule 318(c) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that: “Where counsel has been assigned, such assignment shall be effective until final judgment, including any proceedings upon direct appeal.”

Petitioner’s counsel, appointed in connection with his appeal to the Superior Court, is directed to proceed in accordance with the Rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Hickox, 249 A.2d 777, 433 Pa. 144, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 1969).

249 A.2d 777 (Commonwealth v. Hickox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Kent
780 A.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)
Commonwealth v. Stansell
780 A.2d 603 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)
Ross v. Fulcomer
610 F. Supp. 560 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)
Commonwealth v. West
482 A.2d 1339 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Cooley
444 A.2d 711 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Daniels
420 A.2d 1323 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Stancell
256 A.2d 798 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Commonwealth v. Taylor
250 A.2d 487 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)