Commonwealth v. Hickman
This text of 780 A.2d 604 (Commonwealth v. Hickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2001, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the matter is VACATED and REMANDED to the Superior [605]*605Court for consideration of the merits of petitioner’s claim that plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance when he advised petitioner that he would be eligible to participate in the motivational boot camp program after serving two years of his four year minimum sentence. See Commonwealth ex. rel. Dadario v. Goldberg, 773 A.2d 126, 131 (Pa.2001) (ineffective assistance of counsel claims that arise from plea bargaining process are eligible for review under § 9543(a)(2)(ii) of Post Conviction Relief Act).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
780 A.2d 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hickman-pa-2001.