Commonwealth v. Herr

78 A. 68, 229 Pa. 132, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 561
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1910
DocketAppeal, No. 277
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 78 A. 68 (Commonwealth v. Herr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Herr, 78 A. 68, 229 Pa. 132, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 561 (Pa. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appellants, school directors of Mount Joy township, Lancaster county, were indicted in the court of quarter sessions of that county for a violation of the Act of June 27, 1895, P. L. 395, entitled, “An act to prevent the wearing in the public schools of this commonwealth, by any of the teachers thereof, of any dress, insignia, marks or emblems indicating the fact that such teacher is an adherent or member of any religious order, sect or denomination, and imposing a fine upon the board of directors of any public school permitting the same.” On demurrer to the indictment, the question of the constitutionality of the act was raised, the objections to the same being fivefold. The court of quarter sessions sustained the last two,” that the act was violative of secs. 3 „ and 4 of our bill of rights. On appeal by the commonwealth to the Superior Court all of the objections to the constitutionality of the act were overruled and the judgment of the court of quarter sessions, sustaining the demurrer, was reversed, with leave to the defendants to plead: Com. v. Herr, 39 Pa. Superior Ct. 454. On, the characteristically well-considered opinion of the president judge of the Superior Court its judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28
268 F. Supp. 2d 536 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
United States v. Board of Education
911 F.2d 882 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Smith v. City of Philadelphia
516 A.2d 306 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Wikoski v. Wikoski
513 A.2d 986 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Rhoades v. Abington Township School District
226 A.2d 53 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
State v. Garber
419 P.2d 896 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1966)
Abington School Dist. v. Schempp
374 U.S. 203 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Rawlings v. Butler
290 S.W.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1956)
Commonwealth v. Beiler
79 A.2d 134 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
City of New Haven v. Town of Torrington
13 Conn. Super. Ct. 53 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1944)
Commonwealth v. Luzerne County Commissioners
50 Pa. D. & C. 501 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Minersville School District v. Gobitis
310 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 1940)
Beckman v. Lansberry
36 Pa. D. & C. 175 (Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
Board of Education v. Wheat
199 A. 628 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1938)
Harvey v. National Drug Co.
30 Pa. D. & C. 318 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1937)
Commonwealth v. Stofchek
185 A. 840 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Gerhardt v. Heid
267 N.W. 127 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1936)
Commonwealth v. Fye
9 Pa. D. & C. 32 (Centre County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1926)
Commonwealth v. Martindell
82 Pa. Super. 417 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A. 68, 229 Pa. 132, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-herr-pa-1910.