Commonwealth v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Henderson

379 A.2d 305, 474 Pa. 605

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 28, 1977

DocketAppeal No. 452

StatusPublished

This text of 379 A.2d 305 (Commonwealth v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Henderson, 379 A.2d 305, 474 Pa. 605 (Pa. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Vincent Henderson, was convicted by a jury of second degree murder and after the denial of post-verdict motions received a sentence of eight to twenty years imprisonment. This appeal followed in which appellant’s sole contention is that the trial court erred in ruling that the proposed testimony of a detective was inadmissible hearsay. We have examined this issue and find it to be without merit.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Vincent Henderson, was convicted by a jury of second degree murder and after the denial of post-verdict motions received a sentence of eight to twenty years imprisonment. This appeal followed in which appellant’s sole contention is that the trial court erred in ruling that the proposed testimony of a detective was inadmissible hearsay. We have examined this issue and find it to be without merit.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 A.2d 305, 474 Pa. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-henderson-pa-1977.