Commonwealth v. Heckman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Heckman

42 A.3d 1057, 615 Pa. 423, 2012 WL 1450038, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 987

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 27, 2012·No. 42 MAL 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s *424 decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Wilgus, 6 MAP 2012, and, if deemed necessary by the Superior Court, further briefing to explore the factual distinctions between this case and Wilgus, specifically the ties Defendant Heckman maintained to the residence he originally registered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s *424 decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Wilgus, 6 MAP 2012, and, if deemed necessary by the Superior Court, further briefing to explore the factual distinctions between this case and Wilgus, specifically the ties Defendant Heckman maintained to the residence he originally registered.

Commonwealth v. Heckman, 42 A.3d 1057, 615 Pa. 423, 2012 WL 1450038, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 987 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

42 A.3d 1057 (Commonwealth v. Heckman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.