Commonwealth v. Heckathorn

225 A.2d 227, 423 Pa. 626, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 858
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 4, 1967
DocketAppeal, No. 243
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.2d 227 (Commonwealth v. Heckathorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Heckathorn, 225 A.2d 227, 423 Pa. 626, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 858 (Pa. 1967).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

James Lyle Heckathorn, indicted for murder in Mercer County, appeals from an order in the court be[627]*627low denying his motion for a change of venue. The order appealed from is interlocutory and not appeal-able. See, Commonwealth v. Haushalter, 423 Pa. 351, 223 A. 2d 726 (1966).

Appellant’s position that an appeal from such an order is authorized by Pa. R. Crim. P. 313 is untenable. This specifically permits an appeal by the Commonwealth or the defendant from an order changing venue, but is silent as to an appeal from an order refusing a change of venue. An interlocutory order is not appeal-able unless expressly made so by statute or unless very special circumstances exist which are not present here, .See, Commonwealth v. Byrd, 421 Pa. 513, 219 A. 2d 293 ..(1966).

Appeal quashed without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Pushkarsh
290 A.2d 124 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.2d 227, 423 Pa. 626, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-heckathorn-pa-1967.