Commonwealth v. Heck

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Heck

391 A.2d 683, 258 Pa. Super. 602

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 12, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 1148·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The case is remanded to the lower court for filing of a petition to withdraw the guilty plea. Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa.Super. 500, 388 A.2d 340 (1978).

[603] PRICE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissented for the reasons cited in Judge PRICE’S dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Marzik, supra. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The case is remanded to the lower court for filing of a petition to withdraw the guilty plea. Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa.Super. 500, 388 A.2d 340 (1978).

[603] PRICE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissented for the reasons cited in Judge PRICE’S dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Marzik, supra. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Commonwealth v. Heck, 391 A.2d 683, 258 Pa. Super. 602 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

391 A.2d 683 (Commonwealth v. Heck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related