Commonwealth v. Heck

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Heck

391 A.2d 683, 258 Pa. Super. 602

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 12, 1978

DocketAppeal, No. 1148

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 A.2d 683 (Commonwealth v. Heck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Heck, 391 A.2d 683, 258 Pa. Super. 602 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The case is remanded to the lower court for filing of a petition to withdraw the guilty plea. Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa.Super. 500, 388 A.2d 340 (1978).

[603]*603PRICE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissented for the reasons cited in Judge PRICE’S dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Marzik, supra. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The case is remanded to the lower court for filing of a petition to withdraw the guilty plea. Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa.Super. 500, 388 A.2d 340 (1978).

[603]*603PRICE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissented for the reasons cited in Judge PRICE’S dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Marzik, supra. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 A.2d 683, 258 Pa. Super. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-heck-pasuperct-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack