Commonwealth v. Heaganey
This text of 137 Mass. 574 (Commonwealth v. Heaganey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think that the school-house was on both Chestnut Street and Mechanic Street, because the entrances to it were [576]*576from both streets. Commonwealth v. Jenkins, ante, 572. The remaining question is whether there was sufficient evidence that the defendant’s “building or place” was on Mechanic Street, within the meaning of the St. of 1882, e. 220. We think it was competent for the jury, on the evidence, to find that there was a back entrance to the defendant’s premises from Mechanic Street, and that the premises were on that street, within the meaning of the statute. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 Mass. 574, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-heaganey-mass-1884.