Commonwealth v. Heaganey

137 Mass. 574, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 319
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 27, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Field, J.

We think that the school-house was on both Chestnut Street and Mechanic Street, because the entrances to it were [576]*576from both streets. Commonwealth v. Jenkins, ante, 572. The remaining question is whether there was sufficient evidence that the defendant’s “building or place” was on Mechanic Street, within the meaning of the St. of 1882, e. 220. We think it was competent for the jury, on the evidence, to find that there was a back entrance to the defendant’s premises from Mechanic Street, and that the premises were on that street, within the meaning of the statute. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Heaganey, 137 Mass. 574, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 319 (Mass. 1884).

137 Mass. 574 (Commonwealth v. Heaganey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dougherty v. Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
130 S.W.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)