Commonwealth v. Haywood, D.
This text of Commonwealth v. Haywood, D. (Commonwealth v. Haywood, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 18 MM 2021 : Respondent : : : v. : : : DAVID HAYWOOD, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, in consideration of Petitioner’s “Motion for
Withdrawal of Counsel” and counsel’s “Application to Withdraw as Counsel,” this matter
is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County for it to determine
whether Attorney Eric C. Closs should be granted leave to withdraw. If Attorney Closs is
permitted to withdraw, the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County is ORDERED to
determine whether David Haywood should be permitted to proceed pro se.
The Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County is ORDERED to enter its order
regarding this remand within 90 days and to notify this Court promptly of its determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Haywood, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-haywood-d-pa-2021.