Commonwealth v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hayes

926 A.2d 925

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 10, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 926 A.2d 925 (Commonwealth v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hayes, 926 A.2d 925 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

[926]*926 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of July 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED in part. The Order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for the court to consider the claim, which was raised in his brief below, but not addressed by the panel, of whether petitioner’s confession should be suppressed because his waiver of rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), was not knowing and voluntary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[926]*926 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of July 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED in part. The Order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for the court to consider the claim, which was raised in his brief below, but not addressed by the panel, of whether petitioner’s confession should be suppressed because his waiver of rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), was not knowing and voluntary.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

926 A.2d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hayes-pa-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack