Commonwealth v. Hayes
138 Mass. 185, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 47
Opinion
The testimony of the witness Farnham, identifying the defendant by his voice, was competent. The weight of it was for the jury, but it was properly submitted to them, to be considered in connection with the other evidence of identity. Commonwealth v. Williams, 105 Mass. 62.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Hayes, 138 Mass. 185, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 47 (Mass. 1884).
138 Mass. 185 (Commonwealth v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Smith
415 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
Commonwealth v. Guerro
207 N.E.2d 887 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)
Small v. State
85 N.W.2d 712 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1957)
Riner v. State
176 So. 38 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Brown v. Commonwealth
220 S.W. 1052 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1920)
State v. Karas
136 P. 788 (Utah Supreme Court, 1913)
Rhea v. State
147 S.W. 463 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Mack v. State
54 Fla. 55 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Lowe v. State
96 N.W. 417 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Patton v. State
43 S.E. 533 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Commonwealth v. Best
62 N.E. 748 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
State v. Herbert
66 P. 235 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1901)