Commonwealth v. Hawman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hawman

48 Pa. Super. 343, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 381

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 13, 1911·No. No. 1; Appeal, No. 81·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The majority of this court concur in overruling the as-' [344]*344sign merits of error, and affirming the judgment for the reasons given in Com. v. Beard, ante, p. 319, and in the opinion of the learned judge below.

All of the assignments of error are overruled. The judgment is affirmed, and the record is remitted to the court of quarter sessions of Berks county with direction that the judgment be fully carried into effect, and to that end it is ordered that the defendant, Albert H. Hawman, forthwith appear in that court, and that he be by that court committed to serve and comply with such part of his sentence as had not been performed at the time this appeal was made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The majority of this court concur in overruling the as-' [344]*344sign merits of error, and affirming the judgment for the reasons given in Com. v. Beard, ante, p. 319, and in the opinion of the learned judge below.

All of the assignments of error are overruled. The judgment is affirmed, and the record is remitted to the court of quarter sessions of Berks county with direction that the judgment be fully carried into effect, and to that end it is ordered that the defendant, Albert H. Hawman, forthwith appear in that court, and that he be by that court committed to serve and comply with such part of his sentence as had not been performed at the time this appeal was made a supersedeas.

Commonwealth v. Hawman, 48 Pa. Super. 343, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 381 (Pa. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

48 Pa. Super. 343 (Commonwealth v. Hawman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related