Commonwealth v. Hatfield

628 A.2d 840, 534 Pa. 255, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 174
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 3, 1993
DocketNo. 93 M.D. Appeal Docket 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 628 A.2d 840 (Commonwealth v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Hatfield, 628 A.2d 840, 534 Pa. 255, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 174 (Pa. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 1993, Appellant’s Application for Reargument is granted.

NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, J., dissent. LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did not participate in the decision of this matter.

[256]*256 ORDER

This court having been advised that Appellee, Steven Hatfield, is deceased, the Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is GRANTED and the Application to Proceed with Reargument pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 502(a) and Petition to Vacate Orders Below are DENIED.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Kirkner
805 A.2d 514 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Hancharik
633 A.2d 1074 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 A.2d 840, 534 Pa. 255, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hatfield-pa-1993.