Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. Harris

Commonwealth v. Harris

379 A.2d 589, 250 Pa. Super. 603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 Pa. Super. 603 →
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 26, 1977·No. Appeal, No. 2121·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed, and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below when called, in order to be committed by that court to serve any portion of the sentence which had not been completed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

HOFFMAN, J., dissents based on Commonwealth v. Riggins, 474 Pa. 115, 377 A.2d 140 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Harris, 379 A.2d 589, 250 Pa. Super. 603 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

379 A.2d 589 (Commonwealth v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Riggins
377 A.2d 140 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)