Commonwealth v. Harris & Hickman

7 Gratt. 600
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided June 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

LOMAX, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Upon the first question adjourned, this Court is unanimously of opinion, that two or more persons may be jointly indicted for retailing ardent spirits without a license.

Upon the second question, a majority of the Court is of opinion, that the judgment of the Hustings court of Danville for several fines of thirty dollars against each of the plaintiffs in error, is correct.

*Upon the third question adjourned, a majority, of the Court is of opinion, that judgment should be rendered in the Circuit court affirming the judgment of the Hustings court of Danville.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Harris & Hickman, 7 Gratt. 600 (Va. 1850).

7 Gratt. 600 (Commonwealth v. Harris & Hickman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meadowcroft v. People
163 Ill. 56 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
State v. Griggs
11 S.E. 740 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1890)
Glover v. Commonwealth
10 S.E. 420 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1889)