Commonwealth v. Harris and Cohn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Harris and Cohn

94 Pa. Super. 344, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 3, 1928·No. Appeal 300·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

It is unnecessary to set forth the reasons for which we would affirm the order appealed from (see Com. v. Meeser, 19 Pa. Superior Ct. 1), if the appeal had been taken in time. The Act of May 11, 1927, P. L. 972, provides that “No appeal Shall be allowed, in any ease, from a sentence or order of any court of quarter sessions or oyer and terminer, unless taken within forty-five days from the entry of the sentence or order.” The order appealed from was made July 16, 1928, and the appeal was not taken until September 10, 1928.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

It is unnecessary to set forth the reasons for which we would affirm the order appealed from (see Com. v. Meeser, 19 Pa. Superior Ct. 1), if the appeal had been taken in time. The Act of May 11, 1927, P. L. 972, provides that “No appeal Shall be allowed, in any ease, from a sentence or order of any court of quarter sessions or oyer and terminer, unless taken within forty-five days from the entry of the sentence or order.” The order appealed from was made July 16, 1928, and the appeal was not taken until September 10, 1928.

Appeal quashed.

Commonwealth v. Harris and Cohn, 94 Pa. Super. 344, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 192 (Pa. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

94 Pa. Super. 344 (Commonwealth v. Harris and Cohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related