Commonwealth v. Hargrove
This text of 383 A.2d 949 (Commonwealth v. Hargrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant, Willie Hargrove, appeals from the dismissal of his fifth Post Conviction Hearing Act petition. Appellant pled guilty to five counts of murder generally, four counts of assault and battery with intent to kill, and one count of arson. No direct appeal was taken following the imposition of the judgments of sentence.
Appellant claims that he is entitled to a new trial because his guilty plea was unlawfully induced. This court has decided that precise issue adversely to appellant on two separate occasions. Commonwealth v. Hargrove, 428 Pa. 590, 236 A.2d 523 (1968); Commonwealth v. Hargrove, 434 Pa. 393, 254 A.2d 22 (1969).1 Since the issue has been finally [313]*313litigated, the lower court was correct in dismissing appellant’s petition.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 A.2d 949, 477 Pa. 312, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hargrove-pa-1978.