Commonwealth v. Hardy

270 A.2d 622, 440 Pa. 641, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 639
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 12, 1970·No. Appeal, No. 71·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant raises one issue in this appeal, all others having been disposed of in Mr. Justice Jones’ opinion in Commonwealth v. Hardy, 423 Pa. 208, 223 A. 2d 719 (1966). He alleges that his counsel was ineffective and thus he should be granted a new trial. The post-conviction hearing judge found that he was effectively represented. Nothing has been presented to us [642] which would indicate that appellant was denied effective representation. Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 235 A. 2d 349 (1967). See also, Commonwealth v. Woody, 440 Pa. 569, 271 A. 2d 477 (1970); Commonwealth v. Skipper, 440 Pa. 576, 271 A. 2d 476 (1970); Commonwealth v. Laboy, 440 Pa. 579, 270 A. 2d 695 (1970).

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Hardy, 270 A.2d 622, 440 Pa. 641, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 639 (Pa. 1970).

270 A.2d 622 (Commonwealth v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
235 A.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Commonwealth v. Laboy
270 A.2d 695 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Skipper
271 A.2d 476 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Woody
271 A.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Hardy
223 A.2d 719 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)