Commonwealth v. Hardy
This text of 270 A.2d 622 (Commonwealth v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
Appellant raises one issue in this appeal, all others having been disposed of in Mr. Justice Jones’ opinion in Commonwealth v. Hardy, 423 Pa. 208, 223 A. 2d 719 (1966). He alleges that his counsel was ineffective and thus he should be granted a new trial. The post-conviction hearing judge found that he was effectively represented. Nothing has been presented to us [642]*642which would indicate that appellant was denied effective representation. Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 235 A. 2d 349 (1967). See also, Commonwealth v. Woody, 440 Pa. 569, 271 A. 2d 477 (1970); Commonwealth v. Skipper, 440 Pa. 576, 271 A. 2d 476 (1970); Commonwealth v. Laboy, 440 Pa. 579, 270 A. 2d 695 (1970).
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.2d 622, 440 Pa. 641, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hardy-pa-1970.