Commonwealth v. Hardin

10 Ky. Op. 925, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 59, 1880 Ky. LEXIS 484
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedDecember 9, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 Ky. Op. 925 (Commonwealth v. Hardin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Hardin, 10 Ky. Op. 925, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 59, 1880 Ky. LEXIS 484 (Ky. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Hines :

To authorize an indictment and conviction for indecent exposure of the person the act must have been committed in a public place. It must be an act affecting the public directly. If there was any doubt as to whether the indecent exposure to t-yvo persons in a private place would be indictable there can be no • doubt that it is not indictable if the exposure is so had at the solicitation or with the consent of the persons to whom the exposure is made. 1 Bishop on Criminal Law, Secs. 244 and 1125.

The indictment in this instance does not allege that the exposure of the person, which was in the presence of two other persons, was made in a public place, nor that the exposition was made without the consent of those witnessing it. The demurrer was properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Egolf v. Witmer
421 F. Supp. 2d 858 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
People v. Ring
255 N.W. 373 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
Commonwealth v. Hamilton
36 S.W.2d 342 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ky. Op. 925, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 59, 1880 Ky. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hardin-kyctapp-1880.