Commonwealth v. Hanton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Hanton

5 A.3d 211, 607 Pa. 223, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2202

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 27, 2010

Docket93 EM 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.3d 211 (Commonwealth v. Hanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Hanton, 5 A.3d 211, 607 Pa. 223, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2202 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2010, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the “Emergency Extraordinary Relief Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,” treated as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2010, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the “Emergency Extraordinary Relief Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,” treated as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.3d 211, 607 Pa. 223, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hanton-pa-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack