Commonwealth v. Hamilton
231 N.E.2d 18, 353 Mass. 746
This text of 231 N.E.2d 18 (Commonwealth v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Hamilton, 231 N.E.2d 18, 353 Mass. 746 (Mass. 1967).
Opinion
There was no error in denying the defendant’s motion for new trial. This was within the judge’s discretion. Commonwealth v. Slaney, 345 Mass. 135, 142. The testimony, in certain aspects conflicting, gave ample support for the verdict of guilty of assault and battery by means of a bottle.
Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Patti
407 N.E.2d 1301 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Gagne
326 N.E.2d 907 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
231 N.E.2d 18, 353 Mass. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hamilton-mass-1967.