Commonwealth v. Hamilton
231 N.E.2d 18, 353 Mass. 746
Opinion
There was no error in denying the defendant’s motion for new trial. This was within the judge’s discretion. Commonwealth v. Slaney, 345 Mass. 135, 142. The testimony, in certain aspects conflicting, gave ample support for the verdict of guilty of assault and battery by means of a bottle.
Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Hamilton, 231 N.E.2d 18, 353 Mass. 746 (Mass. 1967).
231 N.E.2d 18 (Commonwealth v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Patti
407 N.E.2d 1301 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Gagne
326 N.E.2d 907 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)