Commonwealth v. Hale
This text of 2 Va. 241 (Commonwealth v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But, this Court is further of opinion, that at the time the motion was made for the Writ of Capias Utlagatum, as aforesaid, it was not proper for the Circuit Court to look back into the Record for errors therein; but notwithstanding any such errors, the Writ should have been awarded, if the return of the Exigent had been accompanied by such judgment of outlawry, as the Law requires; which, in the opinion of this Court, is not shewn by the record in this case, inasmuch as the name of the Coroner who pronounced the said judgment of outlawry is not stated. The Court is therefore of opinion, that the said motion for the Commonwealth should be over-ruled, and a Certiorari be awarded, directed to the Sheriff and Coroner of the county of Monongalia,
That a Certiorari is proper in such case: See Rast. Ent. 332, a. b.; 2 H. H. P. C. 399; 2 Hawkins, 446, ch. 48, § 22; and 1 Chitty’s Cr. Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Va. 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hale-vagensess-1821.