Commonwealth v. Hagan
This text of 26 N.E. 95 (Commonwealth v. Hagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C. Allen, J.
So far as appears, there was no evidence of any illegal sale of liquor upon the premises except in one instance, when a sale was made on a Sunday, in the absence of the defendants, by a young woman who was washing the floor. The court apparently allowed the jury to find the defendants guilty of keeping and maintaining a nuisance upon the evidence of this single [566]*566sale. There was nothing to show that the woman was employed by the defendants in their business. There was no presumption that her act of selling liquor illegally on Sunday was sanctioned by them. We think the jury should have been instructed that this evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction of maintaining a nuisance. Commonwealth v. Hayes, 150 Mass. 506. Commonwealth v. Patterson, 138 Mass. 498.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 N.E. 95, 152 Mass. 565, 1891 Mass. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hagan-mass-1891.