Commonwealth v. Hacker
975 A.2d 1082, 601 Pa. 574, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1312
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 15, 2009
DocketAppeal No. 532 WAL 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 975 A.2d 1082 (Commonwealth v. Hacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Hacker, 975 A.2d 1082, 601 Pa. 574, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1312 (Pa. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether, in order to prove the requisite intent for solicitation to commit rape of a child under 13 under 18 Pa.C.S. § 3121(c), the Commonwealth is required to prove the solicitor had knowledge of the victim’s age when the solicitor clearly had the specific intent to promote or facilitate acts which constituted a strict liability crime.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Hacker
15 A.3d 333 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
975 A.2d 1082, 601 Pa. 574, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hacker-pa-2009.